Yes, another rant. Proceed at your own risk.
Let's say you own a newspaper and ...
1) ... you've named said newspaper "Toronto Sun" and your circulation is, ah, not very encouraging. What do you do? You try to bribe your readers to stay.
How?
Have a contest with a great prize.
What would your readers love to win?
Bran cereal.
The Toronto Sun is running a "Social Media Contest". If readers "like" the Sun on Facebook, they are eligible to win several boxes of bran cereal! What 18-to-50-year-old wouldn't love to win that?
There are many jokes to be had by comparing bran cereal and the Sun but I'll take the high road here.
To make it more enticing, the prize also includes an unnamed, generic brand tablet computer. A quick check at Walmart shows that a similar tablet has a retail price of $144, although it can be had in the US for $97.
Sigh.
I guess if your readership base is the over-65 crowd then this contest might work, assuming this crowd can find Facebook.
But there's absolutely nothing "social" about this contest. It shows a total misunderstanding of the concept.
2) ... you've named said newspaper "Toronto Star" and your circulation is, ah, not very encouraging. What do you do? You try to offer valuable information to your readers.
How?
By using cheap stock pictures of posed models and then pretending that these pictures are somehow related to the story at hand.
The Toronto Star today ran a 7-year-old stock photo from Hungary showing a woman sitting on a sofa. The Star tried to pass it off as fresh art of a Yahoo! employee as it accompanied a column about Yahoo! employees. The Star also misspelled Yahoo!.
As many photographers in the Toronto area know, this is the same stock photo that Toronto's largest camera store has been using on their web site and in their advertising for *years*.
Sigh.
The Star could've used a file photo of the main subject of the article (Yahoo!'s CEO). There are plenty of pictures of her available. The National Post managed to do this. The Post even spelled Yahoo! correctly most of the time.
To be fair, several other Toronto dailies also use set-up stock pictures and pass them off as story-related news photos.
I guess if you think your readership base is the under-65-IQ crowd that doesn't want real information then this might work.
But there's absolutely nothing valuable about using fake photos to shortchange your customers. It shows a total misunderstanding of the concept.