Did the print edition have this "eye popping" typo too?
...missing the boat.
Side note: if the Star was smart (ha!), it would run this feature every day. Plus, get rid of the stupid EXIF data which is absolutely meaningless! Replace it with a small headshot of the Star photographer who made the picture.
Edit: added a link to the picture.
Look at today's paper Warren; they listened to you!
I, for one, don't mind the EXIF data. There are lots of photo enthusiasts who would be curious to know more about how pictures were taken, and the technical aspect of it is a first step.
| Aside: The Star used to run an annual photo contest for readers and it was a big deal. Now, the paper continues to run only its writing contest. But that's a good thing because today, anyone can take a great picture: just push a button and let the digital camera do all the work. No talent required, just Hipstamatic. But writing! Reasonably good spelling is not enough. Apparently, getting the words in the right order requires a lot of work. | |